Reinforcement Learning-Based Post-Training for Robust End-to-End Autonomous Driving Under Dynamic Traffic Conditions

Authors

  • Tage Haraldsson Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.
  • Sorcha Haran School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.

Keywords:

reinforcement learning; autonomous driving; post-training; robust control; dynamic traffic; socio-technical systems; safety governance; deployment

Abstract

End-to-end autonomous driving has advanced rapidly by coupling perception, prediction, planning, and control within unified neural architectures, yet its deployment under dynamic traffic conditions remains constrained by brittleness, distributional shift, and limited assurance. This paper examines reinforcement learning-based post-training as a system-level intervention for robust end-to-end driving. Rather than treating post-training as merely a final optimization step, the analysis positions it within a broader socio-technical architecture involving data pipelines, simulation infrastructure, safety governance, validation regimes, and operational oversight. The paper argues that post-training can improve robustness when it addresses rare interactive scenarios, reward misspecification, and long-horizon credit assignment, but that these benefits depend on careful separation between online adaptation and safety certification. Dynamic traffic conditions are analyzed as compound stressors that combine perceptual ambiguity, social negotiation, adversarial behavior, and infrastructure variability. The discussion considers architectural trade-offs among modular and monolithic policies, infrastructure requirements for replay and simulation, deployment constraints, sustainability costs, fairness concerns, and policy implications. Evaluation is framed as a multi-dimensional problem spanning stress testing, counterfactual simulation, edge-case discovery, and human factors. The conclusion is that reinforcement learning-based post-training is promising but not sufficient by itself; robust autonomy requires layered assurance, traceable adaptation, and governance institutions capable of managing continual learning in public spaces.

References

1. Pomerleau, D. A. (1988). ALVINN: An autonomous land vehicle in a neural network. Carnegie Mellon University.

2. Bojarski, M., Del Testa, D., Dworakowski, D., Firner, B., Flepp, B., Goyal, P., Jackel, L. D., Monfort, M., Muller, U., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, J., & Zieba, K. (2016). End to end learning for self-driving cars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.07316.

3. Codevilla, F., Müller, M., López, A., Koltun, V., & Dosovitskiy, A. (2018). End-to-end driving via conditional imitation learning. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 4693-4700). IEEE.

4. Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., López, A., & Koltun, V. (2017). CARLA: An open urban driving simulator. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning (pp. 1-16). PMLR.

5. Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2012). Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite. In 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 3354-3361). IEEE.

6. Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., & Beijbom, O. (2020). nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 11621-11631). IEEE.

7. Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., Dotiwalla, X., Chouard, A., Patnaik, V., Tsui, P., Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Chai, Y., Caine, B., Vasudevan, V., Han, W., Ngiam, J., Zhao, H., Timofeev, A., Ettinger, S., Krivokon, M., Gao, A., Joshi, A., Zhang, Y., Shlens, J., Chen, Z., & Anguelov, D. (2020). Scalability in perception for autonomous driving: Waymo open dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2446-2454). IEEE.

8. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S., & Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529-533.

9. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

10. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017). Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347.

11. Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2015). Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971.

12. Haarnoja, T., Zhou, A., Abbeel, P., & Levine, S. (2018). Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1861-1870). PMLR.

13. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484-489.

14. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.

15. Shalev-Shwartz, S., Shammah, S., & Shashua, A. (2017). On a formal model of safe and scalable self-driving cars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06374.

16. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 5998-6008). Curran Associates.

17. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.

18. Chen, D., Zhou, B., Koltun, V., & Krähenbühl, P. (2020). Learning by cheating. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning (pp. 66-75). PMLR.

19. Kendall, A., Hawke, J., Janz, D., Mazur, P., Reda, D., Allen, J., Lam, V. D., Qiao, K., & Shah, A. (2019). Learning to drive in a day. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 8248-8254). IEEE.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-06 — Updated on 2026-10-19