Deep Learning-Based Fault Detection and Localization in Hollow-Core Fiber Communication Systems

Authors

  • Tanmayi J. Yogi Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Alain Gimenez Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

Keywords:

hollow-core fiber; fault detection; fault localization; deep learning; optical networks; system resilience; infrastructure governance

Abstract

Hollow-core fiber communication systems are emerging as a transformative infrastructure for low-latency, high-capacity transport, particularly in data center interconnects, metropolitan backbones, and latency-sensitive computational fabrics. Unlike conventional solid-core silica fibers, hollow-core fibers confine light predominantly in air or vacuum, reducing nonlinear impairment and propagation delay while introducing new coupling, microbending, surface-mode, and manufacturing variability challenges. These characteristics alter the fault landscape: degradation may be more localized, more spatially intermittent, and less observable through conventional performance indicators. This paper examines deep learning-based fault detection and localization for hollow-core fiber communication systems from a system-level perspective. It analyzes how deep learning architectures can fuse optical time-domain reflectometry, spectral monitoring, coherent receiver telemetry, environmental sensing, and network control-plane data to identify and localize incipient failures. The discussion emphasizes architectural trade-offs involving latency, capacity, resilience, interpretability, cost, and operational complexity. It also considers governance, policy, sustainability, and fairness implications, especially where advanced diagnostic intelligence becomes concentrated among a small number of infrastructure operators. Through cross-domain comparisons with solid-core optical networks, data center fabrics, and critical infrastructure monitoring, the paper argues that hollow-core fiber fault analytics should be designed as a socio-technical capability rather than a narrow signal-processing task. The conclusion outlines deployment pathways, open challenges, and forward-looking perspectives for resilient, accountable, and equitable hollow-core fiber infrastructures.

References

1. Agrawal, G. P. (2021). Fiber-optic communication systems (5th ed.). Wiley.

2. Mangan, B. J., Farr, L., Langford, A., Roberts, P. J., Williams, D. P., Couny, F., Lawman, M., Mason, M., Coupland, S., Flea, R., Sabert, H., Birks, T. A., Knight, J. C., & Russell, P. S. J. (2003). Low-loss hollow-core silica/air photonic bandgap fibre. Nature, 424(6951), 851–853.

3. Poletti, F., Petrovich, M. N., & Richardson, D. J. (2013). Hollow-core photonic bandgap fibers: Technology and applications. Nanophotonics, 2(5-6), 315–340.

4. Richardson, D. J., Wheeler, N. V., Chen, Y., Hayes, J. R., Sandoghchi, S. R., Jasion, G. T., ... Poletti, F. (2018). Hollow core fibres for data communications. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Th4B.1.

5. Winzer, P. J., Neilson, D. T., & Chraplyvy, A. R. (2018). Fiber-optic transmission and networking: The previous 20 and the next 20 years. Optics Express, 26(18), 24190–24239.

6. Musumeci, F., Rottondi, C., Nag, A., Macaluso, I., Zibar, D., Ruffini, M., & Tornatore, M. (2019). An overview on application of machine learning techniques in optical networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1383–1408.

7. Mata, J., de Miguel, I., Durán, R. J., Merayo, N., Singh, S. K., Jukan, A., & Chamania, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence (AI) methods in optical networks: A comprehensive survey. Optical Switching and Networking, 28, 43–57.

8. Zibar, D., Piels, M., Jones, R., & Schäffer, C. G. (2016). Machine learning techniques in optical communication. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 34(6), 1442–1452.

9. Zhou, D., & Yi, X. (2026). DISTRIBUTED AI-ASSISTED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ZERO-TRUST MICROSERVICES: A TAXONOMY AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. AI and Data Science Journal, 3(2), 1-13.

10. Vela, A. P., Ruiz, M., Velasco, L., Farahmand, F., & Jukan, A. (2018). Soft failure localization in elastic optical networks. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 10(6), 579–588.

11. Saif, W. S., Esmail, M. A., Ragheb, A. M., Alshebeili, S. A., & Alouini, M. S. (2021). Machine learning techniques for optical performance monitoring and modulation format identification: A survey. IEEE Access, 9, 117461–117483.

12. Khan, F. N., Lu, C., & Lau, A. P. T. (2017). Machine learning methods for optical communication systems. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, W3F.2.

13. Chen, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Anomaly detection in optical networks using deep learning. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, M3Z.4.

14. Zhou, Zichuan, et al. "Low-latency wavelength-switched clock-synchronized intra-data center interconnects enabled by hollow core fiber." Optics Express 31.15 (2023): 24739-24748.

15. Habib, M. F., et al. (2020). Hollow core fiber: A new paradigm for low latency optical communication. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(9), 34–40.

16. Richardson, D. J., Fini, J. M., & Nelson, L. E. (2013). Space-division multiplexing in optical fibres. Nature Photonics, 7(5), 354–362.

17. Cisco. (2020). Cisco annual internet report (2018–2023). Cisco Systems.

18. Fokoua, E. N., et al. (2018). Hollow-core fiber for ultra-low latency data transmission. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(11), 2158–2166.

19. Jiang, Y., et al. (2021). AI-enabled optical network fault management: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Network, 35(4), 168–174.

20. Zhang, Y., et al. (2021). Deep learning for fiber fault detection and localization in passive optical networks. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 13(9), D1–D11.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-18