Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Recommendation of Bioactive Peptide Combinations in Healthy Aging

Authors

  • Peter-Michael Rorricht Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • Gilda Jantsch Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
  • Qasim Keer Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
  • Benny Jakobsson Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

Keywords:

reinforcement learning, bioactive peptides, healthy aging, recommender systems, adaptive intervention, fairness, governance, clinical translation, socio-technical systems, safety

Abstract

Healthy aging is increasingly framed as a systems problem in which nutrition, biology, behavior, clinical monitoring, and digital infrastructure interact over long time horizons. Bioactive peptides have attracted attention for their potential roles in metabolic regulation, immune modulation, musculoskeletal maintenance, and age-related disease risk reduction, yet the selection of peptide combinations remains difficult because effects are context-dependent, evidence is uneven, and individual responses vary. This paper examines reinforcement learning as an adaptive recommendation layer for bioactive peptide combinations in healthy aging. Rather than treating recommendation as a one-time classification task, the discussion positions reinforcement learning as a sequential decision system that can learn from longitudinal outcomes, safety constraints, and user context. The paper develops a system-level analysis of architecture, data infrastructure, reward design, robustness, fairness, governance, sustainability, and policy. It argues that the central challenge is not merely algorithmic performance but the construction of a socio-technical infrastructure capable of supporting safe, interpretable, continuously monitored, and equitable recommendations. Particular attention is given to structural trade-offs between personalization and population-level evidence, exploration and safety, automation and clinical oversight, and commercial deployment and public accountability. The paper concludes that adaptive peptide recommendation should be governed as a high-consequence health-adjacent system, with validated endpoints, auditability, human oversight, and lifecycle evaluation. If designed carefully, reinforcement learning could support more personalized and responsive healthy aging interventions; if designed poorly, it could amplify weak evidence, obscure uncertainty, and produce inequitable outcomes.

References

1. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S., & Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529-533.

2. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

3. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484-489.

4. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2015). Recommender systems: Introduction and challenges. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, & B. Shapira (Eds.), Recommender systems handbook (pp. 1-34). Springer.

5. Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887.

6. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44-56.

7. Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care: Addressing ethical challenges. New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981-983.

8. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447-453.

9. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.

10. Dulac-Arnold, G., Levine, N., Mankowitz, D. J., Li, J., Paduraru, C., Gowal, S., & Hester, T. (2021). Challenges of real-world reinforcement learning: Definitions, benchmarks and analysis. Machine Learning, 110(9), 2419-2468.

11. Gottesman, O., Johansson, F., Komorowski, M., Faisal, A., Sontag, D., Doshi-Velez, F., & Celi, L. A. (2019). Guidelines for reinforcement learning in healthcare. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 16-18.

12. Liu, T., Song, X., Dai, X., Ma, H., Muhammad, A., He, Z., & Zhao, K. (2025). Effects of animal-derived peptides on aging-related diseases: a narrative review. Aging Advances, 2(4), 160-165.

13. Udenigwe, C. C., & Aluko, R. E. (2012). Food protein-derived bioactive peptides: Production, processing, and potential health benefits. Journal of Food Science, 77(1), R11-R24.

14. Möller, N. P., Scholz-Ahrens, K. E., Roos, N., & Schrezenmeir, J. (2008). Bioactive peptides and proteins from foods: Indication for health effects. European Journal of Nutrition, 47(4), 171-182.

15. López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M., & Kroemer, G. (2013). The hallmarks of aging. Cell, 153(6), 1194-1217.

16. Kennedy, B. K., Berger, S. L., Brunet, A., Campisi, J., Cuervo, A. M., Epel, E. S., Franceschi, C., Lithgow, G. J., Morimoto, R. I., Pessin, J. E., Rando, T. A., Richardson, A., Schadt, E. E., Wyss-Coray, T., & Sierra, F. (2014). Geroscience: Linking aging to chronic disease. Cell, 159(4), 709-713.

17. Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A. A., Milan, K., Quan, J., Ramalho, T., Grabska-Barwinska, A., Hassabis, D., Clopath, C., Kumaran, D., & Hadsell, R. (2017). Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(13), 3521-3526.

18. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V., Young, M., Crespo, J.-F., & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28, 2503-2511.

19. Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 33-44.

20. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People: An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-15