Adaptive Bandwidth Allocation for Optical Interconnects in Cloud Computing Infrastructure

Authors

  • Agnolo Lettiere Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
  • Jamal Salomonsson Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • Fainche Perri Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
  • Fergus McCay Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.

Keywords:

optical interconnects; adaptive bandwidth allocation; cloud computing; data center networks; software-defined networking; sustainability; fairness; governance

Abstract

Cloud computing infrastructure is increasingly constrained not by computation alone but by the capacity, latency, and energy behavior of the interconnect fabric that binds servers, storage, accelerators, and tenants into a coherent system. Optical interconnects have become central to this fabric because they offer high bandwidth, low loss, and distance-insensitive transmission, yet their static provisioning often lags behind the bursty and heterogeneous demands of cloud workloads. This paper examines adaptive bandwidth allocation for optical interconnects as a system-level problem that spans physical-layer flexibility, network control, resource governance, and sustainability. It argues that adaptive allocation should be understood less as a narrow optimization of link utilization and more as a socio-technical capability that shapes fairness, robustness, deployment economics, and environmental accountability. The discussion analyzes architectural foundations, including wavelength switching, optical circuit switching, and hybrid electrical-optical topologies, before turning to control-plane requirements, telemetry, and learning-based management. It then considers structural trade-offs among latency, capacity, energy, and cost, and examines governance questions that arise when bandwidth becomes dynamically allocated across tenants, services, and regions. The paper also explores robustness, fairness, and sustainability implications, using cross-domain comparisons from wide-area traffic engineering and warehouse-scale computing. It concludes that adaptive optical bandwidth allocation must be designed with explicit policy choices, transparent operational metrics, and resilient fallback mechanisms if cloud infrastructure is to remain efficient, equitable, and environmentally credible.

References

1. Barroso, L. A., Hölzle, U., & Ranganathan, P. (2018). The datacenter as a computer: Designing warehouse-scale machines (3rd ed.). Springer.

2. Kachris, C., & Tomkos, I. (2012). A survey on optical interconnects for data centers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(4), 1021–1036.

3. Benner, A. F., Ignatowski, M., Kash, J. A., Kuchta, D. M., & Ritter, M. B. (2005). Exploitation of optical interconnects in future server architectures. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 49(4/5), 755–775.

4. Farrington, N., Porter, G., Radhakrishnan, S., Bazzaz, H. H., Subramanya, V., Fainman, Y., Papen, G., & Vahdat, A. (2010). Helios: A hybrid electrical/optical switch architecture for modular data centers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4), 339–350.

5. Zhou, Z., Dzieciol, H., Clark, K., Luo, Y., Richardson, D., Poletti, F., ... & Liu, Z. (2023). Low-latency wavelength-switched clock-synchronized intra-data center interconnects enabled by hollow core fiber. Optics Express, 31(15), 24739-24748.

6. Al-Fares, M., Loukissas, A., & Vahdat, A. (2008). A scalable, commodity data center network architecture. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(4), 63–74.

7. Singh, A., Ong, J., Agarwal, A., Anderson, G., Armistead, A., Bannon, R., ... & Vahdat, A. (2015). Jupiter rising: A decade of Clos topologies and centralized control in Google's datacenter network. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 45(4), 183–197.

8. Hong, C. Y., Kandula, S., Mahajan, R., Zhang, M., Gill, V., Nanduri, M., & Wattenhofer, R. (2013). Achieving high utilization with software-driven WAN. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 43(4), 15–26.

9. Jain, S., Kumar, A., Mandal, S., Ong, J., Poutievski, L., Singh, A., ... & Vahdat, A. (2013). B4: Experience with a globally-deployed software defined WAN. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 43(4), 3–14.

10. Poutievski, L., Mashayekhi, O., Tariq, M., Zeghal, R., Li, H., O'Keefe, R., ... & Vahdat, A. (2022). Jupiter evolving: Transforming Google's datacenter network via optical circuit switches and software-defined networking. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference (pp. 66–85). ACM.

11. Ghobadi, M., Gaudette, J., Gunning, P., & Rajan, D. (2016). Projector: Agile reconfigurable data center interconnect. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference (pp. 216–229). ACM.

12. Rumley, S., Bahadori, M., Polster, R., Hammond, S. D., Calhoun, D. M., Wen, K., Rodrigues, A., & Bergman, K. (2017). Optical interconnects for extreme scale computing systems. Parallel Computing, 64, 65–80.

13. Bogaerts, W., De Heyn, P., Van Vaerenbergh, T., De Vos, K., Kumar Selvaraja, S., Claes, T., Dumon, P., Bienstman, P., Van Thourhout, D., & Baets, R. (2012). Silicon microring resonators. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 6(1), 47–73.

14. Masanet, E., Shehabi, A., Lei, N., Smith, S., & Koomey, J. (2020). Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science, 367(6481), 984–986.

15. Jones, N. (2018). How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world’s electricity. Nature, 561(7722), 163–166.

16. Mao, H., Alizadeh, M., Menache, L., & Kandula, S. (2016). Resource management with deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (pp. 50–56). ACM.

17. Chen, L., Lingys, J., Chen, K., & Liu, F. (2018). AuTO: Scaling deep reinforcement learning for datacenter-scale automatic traffic optimization. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (pp. 191–205). ACM.

18. Xu, Z., Tang, J., Yin, C., Wang, Y., & Xue, G. (2018). Experience-driven networking: A deep reinforcement learning based approach. In IEEE INFOCOM 2018 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (pp. 1871–1879). IEEE.

19. Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Veríssimo, P. E., Rothenberg, C. E., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015). Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1), 14–76.

20. Zhang, Q., Cheng, L., & Boutaba, R. (2010). Cloud computing: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 1(1), 7–18.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30