Intelligent Wavelength Assignment for High-Speed Data Center Optical Networks

Authors

  • Mikaere Healey Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Shanna Gilsenan Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Keywords:

optical data center networks; wavelength assignment; intelligent control; routing and wavelength assignment; optical switching; sustainability; governance; machine learning

Abstract

High-speed data center optical networks are increasingly expected to support extreme bandwidth, predictable latency, strict tenant isolation, and sustainable energy use under rapidly changing traffic conditions. Wavelength assignment is often treated as a narrow routing and resource allocation problem, yet in modern data centers it functions as a system-level governance mechanism that shapes capacity distribution, failure recovery, energy consumption, and fairness among workloads. This paper examines intelligent wavelength assignment as an architectural and socio-technical capability rather than a purely algorithmic task. It argues that effective wavelength assignment must coordinate optical switching, electronic packet routing, telemetry, control-plane policy, and physical-layer constraints. The discussion considers reconfigurable optical interconnects, hybrid electrical and optical fabrics, learning-based control, low-margin optical design, and hollow-core fiber based low-latency interconnects. It also analyzes trade-offs among capacity, latency, energy, robustness, fairness, and deployment cost. Particular attention is given to governance implications, including tenant service guarantees, carbon-aware scheduling, infrastructure modularity, and cross-domain lessons from telecommunications and high-performance computing. The paper concludes that intelligent wavelength assignment should be designed as a policy-aware, observable, and resilient control layer that balances technical efficiency with operational legitimacy. Such a layer can improve utilization and reduce energy waste, but only if it remains transparent, auditable, and adaptable to heterogeneous data center environments.

References

1. Cisco. (2020). Cisco Annual Internet Report (2018–2023) white paper. Cisco Systems.

2. Kachris, C., & Tomkos, I. (2012). A survey on optical interconnects for data centers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(4), 1021–1036.

3. Kachris, C., Kanonakis, K., & Tomkos, I. (2013). Optical interconnection networks in data centers: Recent trends and future challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(9), 39–45.

4. Farrington, N., Porter, G., Radhakrishnan, S., Bazzaz, H. H., Subramanya, V., Fainman, Y., Papen, G., & Vahdat, A. (2010). Helios: A hybrid electrical/optical switch architecture for modular data centers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4), 339–350.

5. Ghobadi, M., Mahajan, R., Phanishayee, A., Devanur, N. R., Kulkarni, J., Ranade, G., Blanche, P.-A., Rastegarfar, H., Kilper, D., & Bergman, K. (2016). ProjectToR: Agile reconfigurable data center interconnect. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference (pp. 216–229). ACM.

6. Rumley, S., Nikolova, D., Hendry, R., Li, Q., Bergman, K., & Kilper, D. (2017). Silicon photonics for exascale systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 35(3), 429–438.

7. Cheng, Q., Bahadori, M., Glick, M., Rumley, S., & Bergman, K. (2018). Recent advances in optical technologies for data centers: A review. Optical Fiber Technology, 45, 329–341.

8. Chlamtac, I., Ganz, A., & Karmi, G. (1992). Lightpath communications: An approach to high bandwidth optical WANs. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 40(7), 1171–1182.

9. Zang, H., Jue, J. P., & Mukherjee, B. (2000). A review of routing and wavelength assignment approaches for wavelength-routed optical WDM networks. Optical Networks Magazine, 1(1), 47–60.

10. Ramaswami, R., & Sivarajan, K. N. (1995). Routing and wavelength assignment in all-optical networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 3(5), 489–500.

11. Banerjee, D., & Mukherjee, B. (1996). A practical approach for routing and wavelength assignment in large wavelength-routed optical networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 14(5), 903–908.

12. Suárez-Varela, J., Mestres, A., Yu, J., Kuang, L., Feng, S., Barlet-Ros, P., & Cabellos-Aparicio, A. (2019). Routing in optical transport networks with deep reinforcement learning. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 11(11), 547–558.

13. Pointurier, Y. (2017). Design of low-margin optical networks. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 9(1), A9–A17.

14. Zhou, Z., Dzieciol, H., Clark, K., Luo, Y., Richardson, D., Poletti, F., ... & Liu, Z. (2023). Low-latency wavelength-switched clock-synchronized intra-data center interconnects enabled by hollow core fiber. Optics Express, 31(15), 24739-24748.

15. Al-Fares, M., Loukissas, A., & Vahdat, A. (2008). A scalable, commodity data center network architecture. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(4), 63–74.

16. Greenberg, A., Hamilton, J., Maltz, D. A., & Patel, P. (2008). The cost of a cloud: Research problems in data center networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 68–73.

17. Barroso, L. A., Clidaras, J., & Hölzle, U. (2013). The datacenter as a computer: An introduction to the design of warehouse-scale machines (2nd ed.). Morgan & Claypool.

18. Soref, R. (2006). The past, present, and future of silicon photonics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 12(6), 1678–1687.

19. Vahdat, A., Liu, H., Zhao, X., & Johnson, C. (2011). The emerging optical data center. In Optical Fiber Communication Conference (p. OTuH2). Optical Society of America.

20. Kodi, A. K., & Louri, A. (2009). Energy-efficient and bandwidth-reconfigurable photonic networks for high-performance computing systems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 15(5), 1434–1443.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-08