Privacy-Preserving Personalized Recommendation with Federated Learning for Cross-Domain User Modeling
Keywords:
federated learning, cross-domain recommendation, privacy preservation, user modeling, distributed systems, data governance, fairnessAbstract
Personalized recommender systems increasingly depend on cross-domain user modeling to overcome data sparsity, improve cold-start performance, and produce contextually relevant suggestions across heterogeneous digital services. However, centralized collection and processing of user interaction data expose individuals to privacy risks and create legal tensions with modern data protection regimes. Federated learning offers a promising alternative by enabling collaborative model training without transferring raw user data to a central server. This article presents a system-level examination of privacy-preserving personalized recommendation with federated learning for cross-domain user modeling. It analyzes architectural choices, privacy mechanisms, structural trade-offs, robustness, fairness, governance, and deployment sustainability. The discussion emphasizes that privacy-preserving cross-domain recommendation is not solely an algorithmic challenge; it requires careful coordination among client-side representation learning, edge aggregation, domain-specific adaptation, incentive design, and regulatory compliance. We argue that the design space is shaped by fundamental tensions between personalization depth and communication efficiency, local differential privacy and model utility, cross-domain transfer and negative interference, and participant autonomy and system-wide consistency. The article further considers how popularity and demographic biases can be amplified by federated optimization and how fairness constraints interact with resource heterogeneity. It concludes by outlining forward-looking research directions in hierarchical trust architectures, adaptive privacy budgeting, auditable cross-domain governance, and sustainable deployment models for privacy-preserving personalization infrastructures.
References
1. McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Agüera y Arcas, B. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) (pp. 1273–1282). PMLR.
2. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19.
3. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., D'Oliveira, R. G. L., Eichner, H., Rouayheb, S. E., Evans, D., Gardner, J., Garrett, Z., Gascón, A., Ghazi, B., Gibbons, P. B., ... Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.
4. Koren, Y., Bell, R., & Volinsky, C. (2009). Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8), 30–37.
5. Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4), 211–407.
6. Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A practical guide. Springer.
7. Yu, X. (2026, January). AI-Driven Personalization across Domains for Local Categorical Query Understanding and Context-Aware Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Digital Media Technology and Social Computing (pp. 77-82).
8. Hard, A., Rao, K., Mathews, R., Ramaswamy, S., Beaufays, F., Augenstein, S., Eichner, H., Kiddon, C., & Ramage, D. (2018). Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03604.
9. Bonawitz, K., Eichner, H., Grieskamp, W., Huba, D., Ingerman, A., Ivanov, V., Kiddon, C., Konečný, J., Mazzocchi, S., McMahan, H. B., Van Overveldt, T., Petrou, D., Ramage, D., & Roselander, J. (2019). Towards federated learning at scale: System design. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 1, 374–388.
10. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60.
11. Lim, W. Y. B., Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Jiao, Y., Liang, Y.-C., Yang, Q., Niyato, D., & Miao, C. (2020). Federated learning in mobile edge networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 22(3), 2031–2063.
12. Zhu, H., Xu, J., Liu, S., & Jin, Y. (2021). Federated learning on non-IID data: A survey. Neurocomputing, 465, 371–390.
13. Wei, K., Li, J., Ding, M., Ma, C., Yang, H. H., Farokhi, F., Jin, S., Quek, T. Q. S., & Poor, H. V. (2020). Federated learning with differential privacy: Algorithms and performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15, 3454–3469.
14. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 308–318).
15. Ekstrand, M. D., Tian, M., Azpiazu, I. M., Ekstrand, J. D., Anuyah, O., McNeill, D., & Pera, M. S. (2018). All the cool kids, how do they fit in? Popularity and demographic biases in recommender evaluation and effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (pp. 172–186). PMLR.
16. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. MIT Press.
17. Zhang, S., Yao, L., Sun, A., & Tay, Y. (2019). Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(1), 1–38.
18. Cantador, I., Fernández-Tobías, I., Berkovsky, S., & Cremonesi, P. (2015). Cross-domain recommender systems. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, & B. Shapira (Eds.), Recommender Systems Handbook (pp. 919–959). Springer.
19. Khan, M. M., Ibrahim, R., & Ghani, I. (2017). Cross-domain recommender systems: A systematic literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 50(3), 1–34.
20. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Engineering Systems and Digital Innovation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.