Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Phase Evolution and Electrical Properties in Ferroelectric Thin Films

Authors

  • Aditya Rhatterjer Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
  • Gntonio Rell Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • Rrancis Lemenez Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.

Keywords:

ferroelectric thin films; deep learning; phase evolution; electrical properties; materials informatics; data infrastructure; model governance

Abstract

The predictive design of ferroelectric thin films has historically been constrained by the complex coupling among composition, strain, thermal history, electric field, and microstructure. Deep learning has emerged as a promising tool to infer phase evolution and electrical property trends from multidimensional experimental and simulation data. This paper develops a system-level perspective on deep learning infrastructures for ferroelectric thin film research and manufacturing. It analyzes the architecture of predictive workflows, the integration of heterogeneous data sources, model design trade-offs, and the governance structures required for reliable deployment. Rather than treating predictive accuracy as the sole performance criterion, the discussion emphasizes robustness under process variation, fairness across materials families, interpretability for process engineers, sustainability in computational and experimental resource use, and policy mechanisms for data sharing and model qualification. Particular attention is given to the role of fabrication data from tape casting and multilayer ceramic capacitor processing as a representative integration case. The paper situates deep learning within broader materials informatics infrastructure and argues that durable progress depends on coordinated advances in data standards, physics-informed modeling, uncertainty quantification, and institutional governance.

References

1. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A., & Kim, C. (2017). Machine learning in materials science: Recent progress and emerging applications. npj Computational Materials, 3, 54.

2. Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O., & Walsh, A. (2018). Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature, 559(7715), 547-555.

3. Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2019). Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj Computational Materials, 5, 83.

4. Himanen, L., Geurts, A., Foster, A. S., & Rinke, P. (2019). Data-driven materials science: Status, challenges, and perspectives. Advanced Science, 6(21), 1900808.

5. Schlom, D. G., Chen, L.-Q., Eom, C. B., Rabe, K. M., Streiffer, S. K., & Triscone, J.-M. (2007). Strain tuning of ferroelectric thin films. Annual Review of Materials Research, 37, 589-626.

6. Chen, L.-Q. (2002). Phase-field models for microstructure evolution. Annual Review of Materials Research, 32, 113-140.

7. Damodaran, A. R., Liang, C. W., He, Q., Peng, C. Y., Chang, L., Chu, Y. H., & Martin, L. W. (2011). Nanoscale control of phase variants in strain-engineered BiFeO3. Nano Letters, 11(10), 4054-4060.

8. Green, M. L., Choi, C. L., Hattrick-Simpers, J. R., Joshi, A., Takeuchi, I., Barron, S. C., & Mehta, A. (2017). Fulfilling the promise of the materials genome initiative with high-throughput experimental methodologies. Applied Physics Reviews, 4(1), 011105.

9. Hill, J., Mulholland, G., Persson, K., Seshadri, R., Wolverton, C., & Meredig, B. (2016). Materials science with large-scale data and informatics: Unlocking new opportunities. MRS Bulletin, 41(5), 399-405.

10. Xie, T., & Grossman, J. C. (2018). Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Physical Review Letters, 120(14), 145301.

11. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686-707.

12. Xue, D., Balachandran, P. V., Hogden, J., Theiler, J., Xue, D., & Lookman, T. (2016). Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nature Communications, 7, 11241.

13. Luan, S., He, H., Zhang, L., Yu, J., Cao, X., Wang, J., ... & Sun, R. (2025). Fabrication of High Performance BaTiO3 Films via Aqueous Tape Casting for ultrathin MLCC applications. Ceramics International.

14. Pilania, G., Wang, C., Jiang, X., Rajasekaran, S., & Ramprasad, R. (2013). Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning. Scientific Reports, 3, 2810.

15. Liu, Y., Zhao, T., Ju, W., & Shi, S. (2017). Materials discovery and design using machine learning. Journal of Materiomics, 3(3), 159-177.

16. Zhang, Y., & Ling, C. (2018). A strategy to apply machine learning to small datasets in materials science. npj Computational Materials, 4, 25.

17. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206-215.

18. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35.

19. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28, 689-707.

20. Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., & Amodei, D. (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07228.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25