The Role of Influencer Marketing in Shaping Consumer Perceived Value and Online Pricing
Keywords:
influencer marketing; consumer perceived value; online pricing; platform governance; algorithmic fairness; digital market infrastructureAbstract
Influencer marketing has evolved from a peripheral promotional tactic into embedded socio-technical infrastructure that links content creators, platform algorithms, consumer valuation processes, and dynamic pricing systems. This paper examines the system-level role of influencer marketing in shaping consumer perceived value and online pricing. It conceptualizes influencer-mediated commerce as a multi-sided architecture in which algorithmic curation, promotional content, social proof, and behavioral demand data interact continuously. The paper analyzes how perceived value is produced through signal aggregation, authenticity cues, parasocial attachment, and social comparison, and how these transformations influence pricing algorithms, audience segmentation, and willingness-to-pay. It emphasizes structural trade-offs between efficiency and fairness, personalization and manipulation, platform scale and authenticity, and robustness and opacity. It further considers governance mechanisms, algorithmic accountability, disclosure requirements, consumer protection, and competition policy. Cross-domain comparisons illustrate how influencer effects differ across e-commerce, luxury goods, travel, hospitality, and digital financial content. The paper argues that sustainable governance requires architectural transparency, fairness-aware pricing audits, data minimization, and multi-dimensional consumer welfare assessment. Future research should integrate causal identification, platform ecology analysis, creator labor conditions, and resilience evaluation. The analysis contributes to systems research by framing influencer marketing not as isolated persuasive communication but as infrastructure that shapes price formation and value perception in digital markets.
References
1. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.
2. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
3. De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
4. Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2016). Social media engagement behaviour: A uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2015.1095222
5. Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2016). Matchmakers: The new economics of multisided platforms. Harvard Business Review Press.
6. Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322493212
7. Varian, H. R. (2014). Big data: New tricks for econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.3
8. Sun, M. (2012). How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Science, 58(4), 696–707. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1458
9. Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0810
10. Jin, K. (2023). Impacts of Word of Mouth (WOM) on E-Business Online Pricing. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 31(3), 1-17.
11. Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press.
12. Lambrecht, A., & Tucker, C. (2013). When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(5), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0472
13. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
14. Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158
15. Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM, 59(2), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2844110
16. Tirole, J. (2017). Economics for the common good. Princeton University Press.
17. Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms. (2019). Final report. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, University of Chicago.
18. Khan, L. M. (2017). Amazon's antitrust paradox. Yale Law Journal, 126(3), 710–805.
19. Fader, P. S., & Hardie, B. G. S. (2009). Probability models for customer-base analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2008.11.003
20. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
21. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
22. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
23. Peppers, D., & Rogers, M. (2017). Managing customer experience and relationships: A strategic framework (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Engineering Systems and Digital Innovation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.