Blockchain-Enabled Trust Formation in AI-Driven Inter-Firm Capacity Sharing Ecosystems

Authors

  • Arthur Bernatt Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Yachan Peng Department of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Keywords:

capacity sharing, blockchain, artificial intelligence, trust, inter-firm collaboration, decentralized governance, smart contracts

Abstract

Inter-firm capacity sharing has emerged as a strategic instrument for coping with demand volatility, asset underutilization, and supply chain disruptions, yet its widespread adoption remains constrained by deficits in trust, information asymmetry, and coordination complexity. This paper investigates the architectural convergence of artificial intelligence and blockchain technologies as a mechanism to engineer trust in decentralized capacity sharing ecosystems. By analyzing system-level interactions, we demonstrate that AI-driven predictive and prescriptive models can significantly enhance the efficiency of capacity allocation, while blockchain-based distributed ledger technology provides an immutable, transparent substrate for recording commitments, executing smart contracts, and maintaining verifiable reputation trails without central intermediaries. The discussion is framed around structural trade-offs that arise when integrating these two computational paradigms: the tension between algorithmic opacity and ledger transparency, the scalability limits of consensus protocols in high-frequency capacity markets, and the governance challenges of embedding algorithmic decision rights into autonomous smart contracts. We further interrogate fairness considerations, including how access to AI-derived optimization and blockchain-anchored identity can asymmetrically benefit incumbent firms, and propose a layered architecture that decouples trust computation from capacity execution. Policy implications related to cross-border capacity pooling, data sovereignty, and the regulatory treatment of algorithmically managed capacity consortia are examined. The paper concludes that a carefully orchestrated fusion of AI and blockchain can transform inter-firm capacity sharing from a relationship-intensive, fragile practice into a resilient, semi-automated industrial infrastructure capable of underpinning sustainable supply networks.

References

1. Fang, X., & Zhang, P. (2021). Capacity sharing between competitors. Management Science, 67(7), 4121–4144.

2. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. White paper.

3. Toorajipour, R., Sohrabpour, V., Nazarpour, A., Oghazi, P., & Fischl, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 122, 502–517.

4. Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and securing relationships on public networks. First Monday, 2(9).

5. Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C., & King, J. L. (2018). Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(10), 1020–1034.

6. Huberman, G., Leshno, J. D., & Moallemi, C. C. (2021). Monopoly without a monopolist: An economic analysis of the bitcoin payment system. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(4), 1463–1501.

7. Croman, K., Decker, C., Eyal, I., Gencer, A. E., Juels, A., Kosba, A., ... & Wattenhofer, R. (2016). On scaling decentralized blockchains. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (pp. 106–125). Springer.

8. Josang, A., Ismail, R., & Boyd, C. (2007). A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 618–644.

9. Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Algorithmic accountability: Journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 398–415.

10. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.

11. Al-Breiki, H., Rehman, M. H. U., Salah, K., & Svetinovic, D. (2020). Trustworthy blockchain oracles: Review, comparison, and open research challenges. IEEE Access, 8, 85675–85691.

12. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135.

13. Hu, X., & Caldentey, R. (2023). Trust and reciprocity in firms’ capacity sharing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 25(4), 1436-1450.

14. De Vries, A. (2018). Bitcoin’s growing energy problem. Joule, 2(5), 801–805.

15. Zetzsche, D. A., Buckley, R. P., Arner, D. W., & Föhr, L. (2020). The distributed liability of distributed ledgers: Legal risks of blockchain. University of Illinois Law Review, 2020(4), 1361–1406.

16. Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415.

17. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19.

18. Luu, L., Chu, D. H., Olickel, H., Saxena, P., & Hobor, A. (2016). Making smart contracts smarter. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 254–269).

19. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Schafer, B. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

20. Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-16